8._ A-Deism

The "anthropological turn" of Feuerbach was a critic of the deism that, without the support of a emergentist conception, derived to an atheism (rather an a-deism) humanist.

The hegelian panentheism, that corresponded to a “return” vision, was put under critic to conform it to a “going” vision, in Marx’s "putting it on the feet". Thus, the "dialectic spiritualism" became "dialectic materialism", and, with the feuerbachian humanism, "historical materialism".

A marxism soon transformed to make it cosmic and emergentist -- like the one of Ernst Bloch?--, although it continues being only a “going” vision, comes near to our theist conception, although this one includes in addition as something fundamental a “return” vision that implies the faith in God. Back to the hegelianism? No, because it maintains the emergentism -- dialectic a much more radical one-- and also accepts the vision "of going" like valid counterpoint.

On the other hand, Nietszche denied not only any conception of God, and any vision "of return" therefore (since God is present "until in the grammar"), but in addition he denied any progressive dialectics, any real possibility of progress, along with any objective measurement of this one.
He was consequent, because any progressive dialectics implies the possibility of the God theist (although not the one of the deist).
The concept of "death of God" has three degrees of meaning here:
1º._ End of the belief in the God of the deism. (A-deism).
2º._ End of any vision "of return". (A-apollineism).
3º. _End of the belief in any real possibility --or objective criterion-- of progress. (Nihilism).

We share the first degree with pleasure, and we are against the second, but recognizing the necessity of the visions "of going" with its scope of inviolable autonomy. However, when accepting as a basic fact the cosmic evolutionary process, and the creative capacity of the nature, attributing to it finality (although nonintention in all the levels), we reject its nihilism, even in “going” vision, and we believe in the real possibility of a progress that we can measure and carry out validly according to our cognitive criterion, ethical and aesthetic.